- Kara McMaster
- Posts
- Stop targeting. Start signalling.
Stop targeting. Start signalling.
Manual targeting is fighting the AI. Here's what working with it looks like instead.
Hey ,
If you've run Meta ads in the last 12 to 18 months, you've probably noticed something.
The cost keeps going up. The quality keeps going down.
You're paying more per lead. The leads are less ready to buy. The return on ad spend keeps shrinking.
This is not bad luck.
It's a predictable consequence of using a manual targeting strategy against an AI that has fundamentally changed how it works.
Here's what's happening under the hood.
Meta's Andromeda system evaluates over 10 million ad candidates per single request.
It's not looking at your interest stacking. It's not looking at your lookalike audiences.
It's looking at one thing: the signal in your creative.
It reads your ad, identifies the specific problem it speaks to, and finds the people in its database who are most likely to resonate with that problem, in real time.
When you define the audience manually, you're essentially telling Andromeda: "I know better than you who should see this."
And Andromeda, which has 10 million data points per request and is improving every day, disagrees.
The result is that your manual targeting overrides the AI's ability to find the best matches. And you pay more for worse results.
The shift is counterintuitive but simple.
Stop targeting. Start signalling.
Instead of building an audience, you build a message. A sharp, specific message that speaks to a precise problem your ideal client is experiencing right now.
You give that message to Andromeda and let it do the work.
We proved this directly.
We ran a campaign with zero audience targeting. No interests, no lookalikes, no demographics. Just a sharp signal in the creative.
Cost per booked meeting: $35.
The message found the right people because the AI found them.
The same logic applies to LinkedIn's 360Brew. The platform rebuilt its feed algorithm around signal detection. If your content doesn't have a clear signal, the AI doesn't know where to send it.
It gets buried.
The practical implication:
The quality of your message now matters more than the sophistication of your targeting
An average message with perfect targeting will underperform a sharp message with no targeting at all
You don't need a bigger ad budget. You need a clearer signal.
If you want to understand what a signal-driven ad strategy looks like for your specific offer, let's talk.
Talk soon, Kara